On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:25:14AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
[snip]
Hmm? Please see the quoted bits you wrote, above
Right, yes, it had been so long, I carelessly neglected to refresh my
memory on the history of the bug.
Screen _does_ reread the terminfo - otherwise it wouldn't be
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:48:40AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:15:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Reading this again...
Have you tried restarting screen since you reported this
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:15:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Reading this again...
Have you tried restarting screen since you reported this problem?
I have not, and since I have data I'd rather not lose, I'd prefer
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:15:53PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Reading this again...
Have you tried restarting screen since you reported this problem?
I have not, and since I have data I'd rather not lose, I'd prefer not to
restart the screen session I have.
Can you reproduce it using a
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:58:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
My apologies if this isn't actually important, but it makes xterm too
unpleasant to use for me, and I'm far too old and set in my ways to use a
different terminal emulator or stop using color.
After upgrading my machine today
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:20:36AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Branden Robinson wrote:
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-6
Severity: important
This still sounds like #313352. Does tic -V show 20050611? If it's
still showing 2004-something, then that would explain
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:29:03AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Are you sure you're looking at sarge's xterm?
Positive:
583 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/branden/packages/CHROOTS# dpkg -l xterm
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 05:20:36AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Branden Robinson wrote:
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-6
Severity: important
This still sounds like #313352. Does tic -V show 20050611? If it's
still
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Branden Robinson wrote:
Uh, now I'm starting to get confused:
603 {0} [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# infocmp -F /etc/terminfo/x/xterm
/tmp/xterm.terminfo-from-XTerm-200
The -F option of infocmp wants the parameter to be a source file, not
binary. Use the -A and -B options to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 01:34:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I know the terminfo was upgraded, and I wouldn't be surprised by a
version dependence on xterm, but I thought it was around #192.
We ship XTerm #200 in xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14:
Yes, I know - that's why I assume the dependency
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-6
Severity: important
My apologies if this isn't actually important, but it makes xterm too
unpleasant to use for me, and I'm far too old and set in my ways to use a
different terminal emulator or stop using color.
After upgrading my machine today and coming
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:58:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.4-6
Severity: important
My apologies if this isn't actually important, but it makes xterm too
unpleasant to use for me, and I'm far too old and set in my ways to use a
different terminal
12 matches
Mail list logo
