Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following
message:
Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be
used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation,
upgrade,
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following
message:
Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be
used instead. If this is done by a
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following
message:
Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following
message:
Warning:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC.
Ardo van Rangelrooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for
explanations please see the
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC.
tags 328749 patch
thanks
Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for
explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package,
Package: xmltex
Version: 1.9-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-10) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating
14 matches
Mail list logo