Robert Millan writes (Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:45:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
The people responsible for these decisions in Ubuntu didn't worry
about the non-freeness of the logo. Ubuntu would have been
Robert Millan writes (Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
This leads me to believe that, if we had kept using the non-free logo, our
set of Debian-specific changes to the package would have been a non-issue,
or at least a minor one.
I disagree
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:45:07PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Robert Millan writes (Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
This leads me to believe that, if we had kept using the non-free logo, our
set of Debian-specific changes to the package
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:24:54PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Robert Millan writes ([Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The
answer from Citrix Xen.org):
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Actually, I think there were two problems with firefox
Robert Millan writes ([Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#391935: Bug #391935: Re: The answer
from Citrix Xen.org):
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Actually, I think there were two problems with firefox: the logo issue
(that was solved by changing the icon), and the use
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Actually, I think there were two problems with firefox: the logo issue
(that was solved by changing the icon), and the use of the Firefox
trademark, which required anyone who wanted to use the name firefox
to use only official
Hi Ben,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 07:58:25PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
If the work will be modified in Debian, and if that would require a
name change under the trademark license, presumably we have another
“Firefox” → “Iceweasel” situation and would have to rename the work
ourselves in
Hi Robert!
You wrote:
If the work will be modified in Debian, and if that would require a
name change under the trademark license, presumably we have another
“Firefox” → “Iceweasel” situation and would have to rename the work
ourselves in order to redistribute it in Debian.
The
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:33:22PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Any free/community use can do whatever it wants, quite literally.
Any commercial distribution that wishes to call itself Xen must be
compatible with other Xen branded commercial offerings, otherwise
the commercial
On 07-Oct-2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 10:31 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I’ll ask for clarifications about the rest.
And here are the clarifications.
Thanks very much for your efforts here.
My understanding is the following:
If someone wants to make an
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:23:27 -0700
From: Simon Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: About the Xen trademark policy
-Original Message-
From: Josselin Mouette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 2:31 AM
* Are we allowed to distribute commercially
Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 12:48 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
Yes, we do need more detail; we need to know that *any* recipient of
Debian can redistribute the work to anyone else, modified or
unmodified, commercially or otherwise. (Or to know that these actions
are not allowed, so that we
On 07-Oct-2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 12:48 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
Yes, we do need more detail; we need to know that *any* recipient
of Debian can redistribute the work to anyone else, modified or
unmodified, commercially or otherwise. (Or to know that
Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 19:58 +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
As for the modified or unmodified, I think we have already
considered it acceptable to require a name change for significant
modifications made by third-party distributors. For example, though
I’m not sure, I think this is
Le mardi 07 octobre 2008 à 10:31 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
I’ll ask for clarifications about the rest.
And here are the clarifications.
My understanding is the following:
* We can call the distributed software Xen as long as it is
compatible with upstream regarding to VM
On 03-Oct-2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I simply asked to upstream for a clarification on the use of the Xen
trademark, and received two unambiguous answers.
Thank you for this work.
From Citrix:
Actually, for the community, you can do whatever you like.
The FIT test
16 matches
Mail list logo
