Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-30 Thread Eitan Gurari
Can you try downloading http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/temp/nogjava.perl into src/java/nogjava.perl and invoke one of the listed alternatives. The perl script should remove the generic notation from the java code. -eitan Alternative 1 - perl

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-30 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Eitan Gurari wrote: Can you try downloading http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/temp/nogjava.perl into src/java/nogjava.perl and invoke one of the listed alternatives. The perl script should remove the generic notation from the java code.

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-30 Thread Eitan Gurari
By the way, I did manage to compile the java code with minor modifications as I mentioned earlier. Apparently I misread the posting :-( In any case, an automated process would be useful as the java will likely change and grow in time. I'll wait for confirmation that it works before

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-26 Thread Eitan Gurari
Kapil, I was hoping to work on this problem a week ago, but didn't get to it yet. I hope the packaging can wait a little more before proceeding. Unfortunately, I over stretched with too many commitments and try somehow to float. I believe the problem is easy to fix. -eitan Dear Michael

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-26 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Dear Michael and Eitan, On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Eitan Gurari wrote: Looks like all the errors related to the generic notation. Can you try compiling the file http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/temp/Xtpipes.java After including this file and a minor change to ScriptsManager.java I was

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, [ sorry for the delay ] On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:40:07PM -0500, Eitan Gurari wrote: 2. I'm running the sun-java5-jre package from nonfree. Adding the now necessary dependency to this package would make tex4ht essentially a contrib package -- a pretty high price for solving

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Eitan Gurari
Michael, The problem is in missing import xtpipes.XtpipesUni; at the start of JsmlMathBreak.java And yes, the slash is needed there. Sorry about that. I'll fix the tex4ht distribution shortly. -eitan I tried compiling the java sources using the line from the README which

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, [ CC'ed the Debian bug report again to document the status of the Java issue ] On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:59:05AM -0500, Eitan Gurari wrote: Michael, The problem is in missing import xtpipes.XtpipesUni; at the start of JsmlMathBreak.java Yes, this solved the problem

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Michael Hanke wrote: With respect to the Debian package itself this is no big improvement, though. I tried most (if not all) of the available free Java compilers in Debian, but all failed. I attached the output of the following call as an example: ecj

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Eitan Gurari
Michael, Looks like all the errors related to the generic notation. Can you try compiling the file http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/temp/Xtpipes.java It is the original program with the generic notation removed. It compiles under sun's java. If so, I'll add a short perl script to

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:39:32PM -0500, Eitan Gurari wrote: Michael, Looks like all the errors related to the generic notation. Can you try compiling the file http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/temp/Xtpipes.java It is the original program with the generic notation

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Sorry, for so much replies... On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:40:07PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote: On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote: Looks like all the errors related to the generic notation. Can you try compiling the file

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-17 Thread Michael Hanke
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote: Looks like all the errors related to the generic notation. Can you try compiling the file http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/temp/Xtpipes.java It is the original program with the generic notation removed. It

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-07 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi Eitan, On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:15:26AM -0500, Eitan Gurari wrote: Michael, Can you upgrade your tex4ht utility to that offered at http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html The output for the figure at your place produces an old element type draw:image .../

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-07 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi Eitan, On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:55:56AM -0500, Eitan Gurari wrote: Michael, Thanks a lot. After updating the package the image is now visible in OO (BTW: thanks to the package maintainer for update_src.sh!). However, kword is still complaining about the namespace issue --

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-07 Thread Eitan Gurari
Michael, Thanks a lot. After updating the package the image is now visible in OO (BTW: thanks to the package maintainer for update_src.sh!). However, kword is still complaining about the namespace issue -- but well, it is called oolatex and not kwlatex ;). Any help to install

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-07 Thread Eitan Gurari
Michael, Can you take a look at the `instructions' entry at the end of the first paragraph in http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html -eitan Reading the changelog of the package and the other bugreports I think the problem is that xtpipes is not included in the

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-07 Thread Michael Hanke
Hi, On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 10:47:37AM -0500, Eitan Gurari wrote: Michael, Can you take a look at the `instructions' entry at the end of the first paragraph in http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html -eitan Reading the changelog of the package and the other

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-07 Thread Eitan Gurari
However, while this solves *my* problem I'm not sure whether the official package can take this path. Two things come to my mind: 1. I simply included the binary stuff, but I still do not know where the sources are that where used to build it. They come from the literate source

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-06 Thread Michael Hanke
Package: tex4ht Version: 20060913-1 Severity: normal Hi, I tried to use tex4ht to convert a LaTeX file into an OpenOffice document. The texfile contains essentially only an eps image created with R (file is attached): graph_test.tex (also attached): ---

Bug#405800: tex4ht: oolatex generates invalid documents

2007-01-06 Thread Eitan Gurari
Michael, Can you upgrade your tex4ht utility to that offered at http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html The output for the figure at your place produces an old element type draw:image .../ for figures instead of the newer type draw:frame .../. Also, the script at