On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 08:50:29AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Now I upload (still to DELAYED) the new version,
diff attached.
Thanks!
lintian give two warning (on your and on this NMU)
- policy version
That's non-critical, I'll update it in the next upload.
- empty /usr/bin
I see
Hello,
I'm ready for a NMU, attached I put the diff.
Now I'll upload the package in delayed.
the patch contain:
- fix on 64-bit architecture: use C99 fixed-bit integer
- fix of undeclared function: a potential bug, which can
give problem on some architectures.
Considering the package
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:51:48AM +0100, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
I'm ready for a NMU, attached I put the diff.
Now I'll upload the package in delayed.
Thanks, feel free to upload, but please see comments below.
Considering the package pourpose, maybe Architecture: any
is to wide.
diff -u awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog
--- awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog
+++ awardeco-0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+awardeco (0.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-Maintainer Upload at BSP in Zurich: fix rc bug
+ * Use the C99 bit length integer, to be
Hello,
Now I upload (still to DELAYED) the new version,
diff attached.
I have fixed the problems you pointed in last mail,
and I noticed I forgot one part of the uintXX_t
patch.
BTW:
lintian give two warning (on your and on this NMU)
- policy version
- empty /usr/bin
I see you install the
5 matches
Mail list logo
