Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Note that the correct group name was admin, not adm which is a separate
group; there doesn't seem to be an analogous group on Debian systems, so I
haven't attempted to do any templating here. Debian maintainers, please
comment if you think we
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:09:21PM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
Could this patch be splitted between stuff that could go upstream:
- code changes to make the value of usershare max shares defined at
compile time
- fixes to the man pages
and those that are Debian-specific:
- mostly
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
time is simply not acceptable at all to upstream and should not be
forwarded at this time. (This based on discussion with Jerry @ UDS, in
which he stated it was upstream's policy to not enable additional features
by default but that it was fine for
Quoting Jérémie Tarot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi,
Mathias Gug a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use
smbshare and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which
is however
Hi,
Christian Perrier a écrit :
Quoting Jérémie:
Hi,
Mathias Gug a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:50:01PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
A first concern comes with the dedicated group name. Should we use
smbshare and then still advertise that obsolete acronym (SMB) which
is however
5 matches
Mail list logo
