Russ Allbery wrote:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
attached is a proposal for an NMU.
It will be archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/openldap2.3-2.38-1_2.3.38-1.1.patch
I'm not sure why we would do this rather than just package 2.3.39.
Wouldn't the latter be a
Hi Matthijs,
* Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-05 11:19]:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
attached is a proposal for an NMU.
It will be archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/openldap2.3-2.38-1_2.3.38-1.1.patch
I'm not sure why we would do
Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Upgrade to 2.3.39 is I think the better choice here and after that we
can make the switch to 2.4. And now that 2.4 is officially released I
can add some initially packaging for 2.4 in svn.
If you have some spare cycles to work on 2.3.39, please go
Hi Russ,
* Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-05 18:34]:
Matthijs Mohlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Upgrade to 2.3.39 is I think the better choice here and after that we
can make the switch to 2.4. And now that 2.4 is officially released I
can add some initially packaging for 2.4
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:15:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Hi,
attached is a proposal for an NMU.
It will be archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/openldap2.3-2.38-1_2.3.38-1.1.patch
I'm not sure why we would do this rather than just package 2.3.39.
Wouldn't the
Hi,
attached is a proposal for an NMU.
It will be archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/openldap2.3-2.38-1_2.3.38-1.1.patch
HTH,
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
Hi,
sorry the first patch was missing an ',', updated patch
attached.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
diff -u openldap2.3-2.3.38/debian/changelog
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
attached is a proposal for an NMU.
It will be archived on:
http://people.debian.org/~nion/nmu-diff/openldap2.3-2.38-1_2.3.38-1.1.patch
I'm not sure why we would do this rather than just package 2.3.39.
Wouldn't the latter be a better idea for
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.38
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for slapd.
CVE-2007-5708[0]:
Name: CVE-2007-5708
Status: Candidate
URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-5708
Reference:
9 matches
Mail list logo