Bug#453681:

2007-12-03 Thread Daniel Baumann
Michael Meskes wrote: It's debatable which package is at fault, but it's definitely unacceptable to just reassign the bug without a single line of explanation. again, the current way is: a module source package works with l-m-e, or it doesn't. Assuming that Panthera didn't even check what's

Bug#453681:

2007-12-03 Thread Michael Meskes
It's debatable which package is at fault, but it's definitely unacceptable to just reassign the bug without a single line of explanation. Assuming that Panthera didn't even check what's going on, here's the explanation: linux-modules-extra calls make inside virtualbox-ose-source with a

Bug#453681:

2007-12-03 Thread Daniel Baumann
Michael Meskes wrote: I can live with this if you can point me to some documentation about how l-m-e works. I wasn't able to find it yet. there is none, yet. probably it doesn't even make sense to write one, depending on ETA of dkt. a task for semester break anyway. -- Address:Daniel

Bug#453681:

2007-12-03 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: again, the current way is: a module source package works with l-m-e, or it doesn't. I can live with this if you can point me to some documentation about how l-m-e works. I wasn't able to find it yet. he did, and saw that it is

Bug#453681: linux-modules-extra-2.6: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.22-3-686 is broken, module badly named

2007-11-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6 Version: 2.6.22-9 Severity: important virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.22-3-686 contains virtualbox-ose.ko instead of the expected vboxdrv.ko that's generated by module-assistant. This renders this binary package useless. -- System Information: Debian Release: