On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Robert Luberda wrote:
Hi,
It would be great if lintian could check the doc-base files sections.
Nevertheless we need to improve the doc-base section hierarchy first
to make it better fit to documentation needs. I don't think it should
be strictly bound to the menu's
Hi Robert,
Robert Luberda wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somehow I must have completely missed that discussion. Thank you for
the pointer. I guess what happens next is in the hands of doc-base
maintainer then?
That
Hi,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somehow I must have completely missed that discussion. Thank you for
the pointer. I guess what happens next is in the hands of doc-base
maintainer then?
That would be my preference. If he says
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Severity: wishlist
Hi lintian maintainers,
According to the instructions shipped with the doc-base package, file
/usr/share/doc/doc-base/doc-base.txt.gz , paragraph 2.3.2.1, the
Section field in a doc-base file should use the Debian menu sections:
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to the instructions shipped with the doc-base package, file
/usr/share/doc/doc-base/doc-base.txt.gz , paragraph 2.3.2.1, the
Section field in a doc-base file should use the Debian menu sections:
_Section_
Section where the
Russ Allbery wrote:
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
X-Debbugs-CC'ed to the doc-base maintainer in case he wants to comment.
Note, if it was *not* the intention to have doc-base follow the menu
policy transition, please reassign this bug to doc-base and retitle to
doc-base: should
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Somehow I must have completely missed that discussion. Thank you for
the pointer. I guess what happens next is in the hands of doc-base
maintainer then?
That would be my preference. If he says that we'll continue using the
menu categories, I'm
7 matches
Mail list logo