On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:12:31PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
That is not nearly as good as using sensible-browser
Why not?
Highest prio available, so that is always used, sensible-browser
itself making sure it will choose the right browser, no matter the
situation (number of users, number
2008/6/19 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:12:31PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
That is not nearly as good as using sensible-browser
Why not?
Many reasons (which, by the way, were exposed before, but I'll expand):
1) browser only really works if the $BROWSER varible is
2008/6/2 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:44:03PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I am really confused by that ever. Are you suggesting that it
shouldn't have been there in the first place?!
No, it should be there because that is the intended behavior, but I
don't
2008/5/31 Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see no compelling reason why sensible-browser should ever appear in
I am really confused by that ever. Are you suggesting that it
shouldn't have been there in the first place?!
If that is so, then I would really need an explanation to be convinced.
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:44:03PM +0300, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I am really confused by that ever. Are you suggesting that it
shouldn't have been there in the first place?!
No, it should be there because that is the intended behavior, but I
don't particularly like it.
2) Because
I see no compelling reason why sensible-browser should ever appear in
mailcap, so I don't know why this is a serious bug of debianutils.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
