On 08/03/08 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:41:00PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
imagemagick 6.3.9.0 is
Hi Lucas!
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering about the status of imagemagick. Are you going to upload
the new version to unstable soon, or do you prefer to stay with the
current version in lenny? (I have a new upstream version of
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 05:41:00PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
imagemagick 6.3.9.0 is available from upstream. Are you planning to
package
Package: imagemagick
Version: 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
imagemagick 6.3.9.0 is available from upstream. Are you planning to
package it?
It *seems* to fix a bug I'm seeing during librmagick-ruby's build (see
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=133aid=18047group_id=12
for
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
imagemagick 6.3.9.0 is available from upstream. Are you planning to
package it?
Even 6.3.9.1 is out by now, I think. We'll have to review the diff to
the version currently in Debian for the potential ABI/API breakage and
other
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:49:34AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
imagemagick 6.3.9.0 is available from upstream. Are you planning to
package it?
Even 6.3.9.1 is out by now, I think. We'll have to review the diff
On 07/03/08 at 20:03 +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
It *seems* to fix a bug I'm seeing during librmagick-ruby's build (see
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detailatid=133aid=18047group_id=12
for the gory details).
Thanks for sharing this information. This is good incentive for an
update.
7 matches
Mail list logo
