On Fr, 13 Mär 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Good point. But if I recall correctly, then Kurt (whom you may know from his
> TU Wien days and who is still just a local phone call away) once told me that
The name somehow rings a bell.
> Karl Berry supposedly had a fix for this. But maybe both Ku
On 13 March 2009 at 14:14, Norbert Preining wrote:
| On Fr, 13 M r 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | Yesterday Norbert uploaded a new texlive package, which solved the
| > | problem. Would you be so kind to check?
|
| The problem solved was with respect to recompilation, but the ~ problem
| in
On Fr, 13 Mär 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | Yesterday Norbert uploaded a new texlive package, which solved the
> | problem. Would you be so kind to check?
The problem solved was with respect to recompilation, but the ~ problem
in pdftex is still present!
> <*> /tmp/buildd/r-base-2.9.0~
>
Bad news:
On 12 March 2009 at 15:51, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
| On 09.03.09 Dirk Eddelbuettel (e...@debian.org) wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| [ test if bug is fixed ]
|
| > Sure thing, esp as a new set of R release candidates is around the
| > corner.
| >
| > But I got bitten by another build-dependency is
On 12 March 2009 at 15:51, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
| On 09.03.09 Dirk Eddelbuettel (e...@debian.org) wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| [ test if bug is fixed ]
|
| > Sure thing, esp as a new set of R release candidates is around the
| > corner.
| >
| > But I got bitten by another build-dependency issue --
| >
On 09.03.09 Dirk Eddelbuettel (e...@debian.org) wrote:
Hi,
[ test if bug is fixed ]
> Sure thing, esp as a new set of R release candidates is around the
> corner.
>
> But I got bitten by another build-dependency issue --
> texlive-base-bin depends on libpoppler3 which seems to have
> vanished,
On 9 March 2009 at 20:06, Norbert Preining wrote:
| On Mo, 09 M r 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > But I got bitten by another build-dependency issue -- texlive-base-bin
| > depends on libpoppler3 which seems to have vanished, yet has not yet been
| > rebuilt libpoppler4. Do you know anything a
On Mo, 09 Mär 2009, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> But I got bitten by another build-dependency issue -- texlive-base-bin
> depends on libpoppler3 which seems to have vanished, yet has not yet been
> rebuilt libpoppler4. Do you know anything about that?
Yes I know, I have already worked on updating t
On 9 March 2009 at 18:27, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
| On 25.06.08 Dirk Eddelbuettel (e...@debian.org) wrote:
|
| > Package: texinfo
| > Version: 4.11.dfsg.1-4
| > Severity: normal
| >
| > Hi Debian tex maintainers,
| >
| > GNU R, just like a lot of other packages, keeps its primary documentation in
On 25.06.08 Dirk Eddelbuettel (e...@debian.org) wrote:
> Package: texinfo
> Version: 4.11.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi Debian tex maintainers,
>
> GNU R, just like a lot of other packages, keeps its primary documentation in
> .info format and generates various outputs from it. As the R ma
reassign 487974 package texlive-base-bin
merge 487974 483966
stop
On 25.06.08 Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: texinfo
> Version: 4.11.dfsg.1-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi Debian tex maintainers,
>
> GNU R, just like a lot of other packages, keeps its primary documentation
Package: texinfo
Version: 4.11.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
Hi Debian tex maintainers,
GNU R, just like a lot of other packages, keeps its primary documentation in
.info format and generates various outputs from it. As the R maintainer, I
try to be pro-active during the R release cycle and usually
12 matches
Mail list logo
