Bug#500965: lists.debian.org: Should remove DKIM and DomainKey headers

2008-10-03 Thread Thomas Viehmann
severity important thanks Hi Russel, thanks for alerting us of this problem. Russell Coker wrote: [ signatures in DKIM-Signature and DomainKey-Signature broken by appending a footer] For lists where the footer only contains unsubscription information, an alternative to removing the headers

Bug#500965: lists.debian.org: Should remove DKIM and DomainKey headers

2008-10-03 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based on whether it's going to be sent to a list or not as the only way to

Bug#500965: lists.debian.org: Should remove DKIM and DomainKey headers

2008-10-03 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi Russell, Russell Coker wrote: On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based on whether it's going to be sent to a list

Bug#500965: lists.debian.org: Should remove DKIM and DomainKey headers

2008-10-03 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker said: On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based on whether it's going to

Bug#500965: lists.debian.org: Should remove DKIM and DomainKey headers

2008-10-02 Thread Russell Coker
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: normal Gmail sends out all mail signed with DKIM and DomainKeys, the DKIM signatures do not include a length field so any change to the message length (such as appending a list footer) will break the signature. To deal with this problem the default