2008/12/7 Jan Hauke Rahm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 363003 +patch
tag 422342 +patch
thanks
Just for the record, a new patch is attached.
That looks sane. Please try to build the package with that patch (to
check that the docs build; I assume you checked the patch works ;-) )
and if that works,
2008/12/9 Eddy Petrișor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/12/7 Jan Hauke Rahm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 363003 +patch
tag 422342 +patch
thanks
Just for the record, a new patch is attached.
When I said that I was referring to the patch ignoredfilesaction.diff.
Please try to avoid to maneuver bugs in a
tag 363003 +patch
tag 422342 +patch
thanks
Just for the record, a new patch is attached.
Hauke
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog (revision 11968)
+++ debian/changelog (working copy)
@@ -30,8 +30,10 @@
* improved
Jan Hauke Rahm a scris:
Hi Eddy,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:49:46PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
OTOH, if failing can be avoided (svn add --no-ignore everything except
.svn dirs), I think that is preferable.
So, since using svn add --no-ignore would yeld the same results for
interactive
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 02:00:07PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
That sounds sane, but it seems you forgot to attach the patch (the second
time)
and since the current one is outdated, makes sense for me to wait :-) .
Seems I need some holidays... :) And *now* the patch *will be* attached!
*argh*
typo and missing ;
new patch attached.
Hauke
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Eddy,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:49:46PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
OTOH, if failing can be avoided (svn add --no-ignore everything except
.svn dirs), I think that is preferable.
So, since using svn add --no-ignore would yeld the same results for
interactive for as for noninteractive
2008/11/25 Jan Hauke Rahm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
This is not OK, since it breaks noninteractive builders. It should use
some form of withEcho or something simillar in order to take into
account the noninteractive option.
True, my
Jan Hauke Rahm a scris:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
This is not OK, since it breaks noninteractive builders. It should use
some form of withEcho or something simillar in order to take into
account the noninteractive option.
True, my stupid mistake.
Oops, I sent the message to the wrong bug, initially.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eddy Petrișor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/11/25
Subject: Re: r11871 - in /deb-maint/svn-buildpackage/trunk:
SDCommon.pm debian/changelog
To: Jan Hauke Rahm [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:38:52PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
This is not OK, since it breaks noninteractive builders. It should use
some form of withEcho or something simillar in order to take into
account the noninteractive option.
True, my stupid mistake. Unfortunately withecho doesn't fit
11 matches
Mail list logo
