Control: tags -1 wontfix
Dimitri John Ledkov:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:29:39 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote:
>> [despite having not yet replied to this thread, I am watching it...I
>> just don't have the desire to add to yet another giant, silly thread on
>> -devel. anyways...]
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 08,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:29:39 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote:
> [despite having not yet replied to this thread, I am watching it...I
> just don't have the desire to add to yet another giant, silly thread on
> -devel. anyways...]
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:21:42PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > >
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:59:00PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be writes:
Find a patch attached, for a smooth transition from DEBIAN/md5sums to a
recent checksum.
The way it is implemented, is that the dh_md5sums is a symlink to the
new dh_checksums. The new
Hello,
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:36 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:08 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
What about a transitional dh_md5sums that would produce md5sum AND
invoke dh_sha ?
Or call it dh_checksums or something so we don't have
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 23:19 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:36 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:08 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
What about a transitional dh_md5sums that would produce md5sum AND
invoke
[despite having not yet replied to this thread, I am watching it...I
just don't have the desire to add to yet another giant, silly thread on
-devel. anyways...]
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:21:42PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Your comments on the patch are obviously welcome (feel free to hack
retitle 540215 Introduce dh_checksums
tag 540215 +patch
thanks
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 20:08 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
What about a transitional dh_md5sums that would produce md5sum AND
invoke dh_sha ?
Or call it dh_checksums or something so we don't have to
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Note regarding the patch:
I have tried to make the patch so it isn't too intrusive (for
instance, dh_checksums is a symlink to dh_md5sums even though it
should be the other way around).
Symlink direction seems irrelevant.
I'd probably just make dh_md5sums call
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:21 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
Note regarding the patch:
I have tried to make the patch so it isn't too intrusive (for
instance, dh_checksums is a symlink to dh_md5sums even though it
should be the other way around).
Symlink direction
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be writes:
Find a patch attached, for a smooth transition from DEBIAN/md5sums to a
recent checksum.
The way it is implemented, is that the dh_md5sums is a symlink to the
new dh_checksums. The new helper computes both md5sum (for
compatibility/transition) and a new
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:59 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be writes:
Find a patch attached, for a smooth transition from DEBIAN/md5sums to a
recent checksum.
The way it is implemented, is that the dh_md5sums is a symlink to the
new dh_checksums. The new helper
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be writes:
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:59 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
1. Strengthen the integrity check so that it could potentially be useful
for security purposes as well as for simple integrity checking.
Yes, this is the intended goal. Imagine the following
12 matches
Mail list logo
