I have had the same problem with a bigmem 2.6.30 kernel on Debian Squeeze
I solved installing the backport made by Bertrand
and with the downgrade of libdrm2 from 2.4.12-1 to 2.3.1-2
--
Dott. Mauro Michelotti
--
To
Hi,
I don't know if you still have no hardware acceleration, but it seems that
downgrading libdrm to 2.3.1 (in Lenny, see
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libdrm2) could give you hardware
acceleration with Xserver 1.4 and Linux 2.6.30.
Bertrand
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if you still have no hardware acceleration, but it seems
that downgrading libdrm to 2.3.1 (in Lenny, see
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libdrm2) could give you hardware
acceleration with Xserver 1.4 and Linux 2.6.30.
Bertrand
Thanks for the tip.
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if you still have no hardware acceleration, but it seems
that downgrading libdrm to 2.3.1 (in Lenny, see
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libdrm2) could give you hardware
acceleration with Xserver 1.4 and Linux 2.6.30.
Bertrand
Thanks Bertrand! It
Gary Dale a écrit :
I tried it with both the source and compiled modules with the same
results. They installed without problems. However, apart from the
higher refresh rate I'm getting with the fglrx driver, there's not a
lot of difference between this and the vesa driver. The vesa driver
Gary Dale a écrit :
Yes. I followed Patrick's recipe:
# apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assistant
# m-a a-i fglrx
See attached log:
Here are the interesting lines of your Xorg.0.log. It means you don't
have hardware acceleration :
(II) fglrx(0): driver needs
Gary Dale a écrit :
I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2.
That seems a little strange.
Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I can't
figure out where it comes from.
Also noticed that I've somehow lost ACPI support. I know I used to
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Gary Dale a écrit :
I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2.
That seems a little strange.
Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I
can't figure out where it comes from.
Also noticed that I've somehow lost ACPI
Gary Dale schrieb:
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Gary Dale a écrit :
I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2.
That seems a little strange.
Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I
can't figure out where it comes from.
Also noticed that I've
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Gary Dale a écrit :
I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as
1.4.2. That seems a little strange.
Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I
can't figure out where it comes from.
Hi,
I think I corrected the issue with the diversions. Could you try again
the new version here ?
deb http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/
deb-src http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/
Regards,
Bertrand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Hi,
I think I corrected the issue with the diversions. Could you try again
the new version here ?
deb http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/
deb-src http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/
Regards,
Bertrand
What packages do
Bertrand Marc wrote:
No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports
with the following :
#install the build dependancies
sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver
#download the source of the backport
wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz
wget
Bertrand Marc wrote:
No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports
with the following :
#install the build dependancies
sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver
#download the source of the backport
wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz
wget
Bertrand Marc wrote:
No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports
with the following :
#install the build dependancies
sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver
#download the source of the backport
wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz
wget
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I
could no longer get into X.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
linux-image-2.6.30 was
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification:
Hi,
I just made a backport for Xorg 7.3. Could you test it ?
http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/
Bertrand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Bertrand Marc wrote:
Hi,
I just made a backport for Xorg 7.3. Could you test it ?
http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/
Bertrand
I'd try but I need amd64 packages. Any chance of you posting them?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports
with the following :
#install the build dependancies
sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver
#download the source of the backport
wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz
wget
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I
could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver under
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I
could no longer get into X. Removing and
26 matches
Mail list logo
