Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-12-16 Thread Daniel Baumann
tag 552402 pending thanks Hi, in my opinion, it is ok to have etherboot-qemu as a binary package providing only those targets that are of interest for qemu/kvm; 'forcing' 32mb of unwanted stuff for others when it's so easily avoidable doesn't sound right to me. Therefore, I've uploaded 5.4.

Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-02 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:56:22PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote: > > I see now reasons why they wouldn't switch, though maybe with some > > delay. > > So Vagrant: is it OK for you if we don't solve this for etherboot? i think it would still make sense for etherboot to ship the appropriate roms unco

Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
RISKÓ Gergely wrote: Hi, What about KVM? Does it do the same as QEMU and will change to PXE? kvm *is* qemu. Stable series (qemu-kvm) of kvm are based on stable series of qemu. But it does not really matter. It's more: I don't quite understand what are you talking about "change to gPXE" (yo

Bug#552402: Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-02 Thread RISKÓ Gergely
Hi, > I see now reasons why they wouldn't switch, though maybe with some > delay. So Vagrant: is it OK for you if we don't solve this for etherboot? Gergely -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:21:04PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote: > Hi, > > What about KVM? Does it do the same as QEMU and will change to PXE? > I see now reasons why they wouldn't switch, though maybe with some delay. > > On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:35:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno > writes: > > > On

Bug#552402: Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-02 Thread RISKÓ Gergely
Hi, What about KVM? Does it do the same as QEMU and will change to PXE? Gergely On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:35:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno writes: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:40:12PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote: >> > On Mon, 26 Oct

Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-02 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:40:12PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:01 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian > > writes: > > If I understand correctly, the problems are: > >- etherboot ships with rom.gz, which is

Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-01 Thread RISKÓ Gergely
Hi, On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:40:12 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > my preference would still be for a separate package, but it's just a case of > different priorities at that point. Yes, and sorry to say, but not convinced. My opinion is, that you are in a very specific case with the requirem

Bug#552406: Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-11-01 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:58:08PM +0200, RISKÓ Gergely wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:01 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian > writes: > If I understand correctly, the problems are: >- etherboot ships with rom.gz, which is not usable by qemu, (major) >- etherboot installed package size is 32MB

Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-10-28 Thread RISKÓ Gergely
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:36:01 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > understandable. using the logic that the proposed new etherboot > package would only include roms useful to virtual machines also > present in the archive could hopefully keep the scope of the package > sane. If I understand correc

Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-10-27 Thread Julien BLACHE
Vagrant Cascadian wrote: Hi, > one option would be for qemu or kvm to uncompress the needed roms at package > install time, though this could potentially get out of sync with the installed > version of etherboot. And what about patching qemu to support gzipped ROM images? Is there anything that

Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-10-26 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:14:47PM +0200, RISKO Gergely wrote: > Thanks for the idea. thanks for taking the time to consider it. > Somehow I'm not really sure about this. > > First of all, the files in /usr/share/etherboot are currently gzipped? > Can qemu and kvm use them, or do the system ad

Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-10-26 Thread RISKO Gergely
Hi, Thanks for the idea. Somehow I'm not really sure about this. First of all, the files in /usr/share/etherboot are currently gzipped? Can qemu and kvm use them, or do the system administrator has to ungzip them before? Why the images for kvm/qemu, why not for vmware/virtualbox/whatnot? What

Bug#552402: etherboot: separate package for roms useful to qemu/kvm

2009-10-25 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: etherboot Version: 5.4.3+dfsg-0.2 Severity: wishlist please consider packaging etherboot with a separate package for roms useful to qemu or kvm. currently, qemu (and maybe kvm?) ship roms by adding etherboot as a build-depends and copying the roms into the package, but this makes it hard