Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-20 Thread Kenton Varda
I've made 2.2.0a live. Thanks! And sorry about all the different libprotobufs. Bumping the soname for every release is pretty ugly but given the complexity of the protobuf interface (particularly the interface between protoc-generated code and the runtime library) there just isn't any other

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 20 November 2009 at 14:37, Kenton Varda wrote: | I've made 2.2.0a live. Thanks! Thank you! Debian also already accepted this from the NEW queue (because a new soname - new libpackage name) into 'unstable' and several arches have already built it. | And sorry about all the different

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Patrick, I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact debian-release. Nobody at the Debian release lists followed up on my posts. Nobody followed up when I pointed out that the upstream soname of

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Kenton Varda
Bumping the soname is part of our release process, since C++ ABI compatibility is practically impossible to maintain. Unfortunately, if SVN is to be believed, it appears that somehow this didn't happen with the 2.2.0 release. And here I thought I had finally done a release without screwing

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Sune Vuorela
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:13:44 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Patrick, I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact debian-release. Nobody at the Debian release lists followed up on my posts.

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Kenton Varda
I've created a 2.2.0a release: SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/ tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2 Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246 I will make it live on the official site as soon as you confirm

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: message body text Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote: | [ kenton varda, upstream release engineer for protobuf, added to Cc. ] | | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | I am not sure what the

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
Kenton Varda wrote: I've created a 2.2.0a release: SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/ tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2 Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246 I will make it live on the official

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 19 November 2009 at 01:45, Sune Vuorela wrote: | On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:13:44 Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Patrick, | | I am sorry about the breakage in mumble. I had coordinated the NMU I made | for protobuf 2.2 with Iustin who had suggested that I contact | debian-release. |

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote: | since the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 have demonstrably broken ABI | compatibility, the SONAME really should be bumped, regardless of NEW | delays, etc. because it is the correct thing to do, rather than breaking |

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 November 2009 at 20:39, Robert Edmonds wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 18 November 2009 at 18:55, Robert Edmonds wrote: | | since the changes from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 have demonstrably broken ABI | | compatibility, the SONAME really should be bumped, regardless of NEW | | delays, etc.

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 November 2009 at 17:10, Kenton Varda wrote: | I've created a 2.2.0a release: | | SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/ | tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2 | Diff from 2.2.0: http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/detail?r=246 | |

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Robert Edmonds
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Still just one package: mumble (as mumble and mumble-server come from the same source package, hence count as one, and protobuf-c-compiler comes from protobuf itself and counts as zero leaving exactly one package -- mumble). protobuf-c-compiler is built from the

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 November 2009 at 21:01, Robert Edmonds wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Still just one package: mumble (as mumble and mumble-server come from the | same source package, hence count as one, and protobuf-c-compiler comes from | protobuf itself and counts as zero leaving exactly one

Bug#556563: protobuf and mumble

2009-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Kenton, On 18 November 2009 at 19:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | On 18 November 2009 at 17:10, Kenton Varda wrote: | | I've created a 2.2.0a release: | | | | SVN: http://protobuf.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.2.0a/ | | tarball: http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/web/protobuf-2.2.0a.tar.bz2 | |