On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:48:37PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
What I meant was that the unstable version is a little bit too
experimental for me. Recovery from a broken grub2 upgrade can be
_pretty_ difficult. This means there is a high risk for doing
grub2
Hi Harald,
Harald Dunkel wrote:
What I meant was that the unstable version is a little bit too
experimental for me. Recovery from a broken grub2 upgrade can be
_pretty_ difficult. This means there is a high risk for doing
grub2 upgrades, even if the code itself is very stable.
IMHO the
Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 20:22 +0100 schrieb Harald Dunkel:
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20100128-1
Severity: wishlist
Do you think it would be possible to release new versions
of grub2 on experimental? I understand that the unstable
version is what the name says, but even packages
On 01/30/10 11:08, Felix Zielcke wrote:
I'm not so sure I get the point of your report, because it looks more
like a general request then a specific request to update the version in
there.
Maybe you just missed that we already have packages in experimental?
See e.g.
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.98~20100128-1
Severity: wishlist
Do you think it would be possible to release new versions
of grub2 on experimental? I understand that the unstable
version is what the name says, but even packages much less
important than grub2 make use of the experimental section
to
5 matches
Mail list logo
