Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Dmitry Bogatov writes: > I do not see large gap between "System management commands" and > "binaries for system administration". So I still claim that this is FHS > violation. But... > ... I have to admit that fixing this warning, especially with > non-cooperative upstream (e.g #932438) causes

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-23 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-07-21 14:49] Vincent Bernat > ❦ 19 juillet 2019 13:02 +00, Dmitry Bogatov : > > > Unless it is false-positive, it constitutes violation of FHS, so it > > warrants "warning" severity. > > As stated earlier, there is a large gap on language between manual > section definitions and

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-21 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 19 juillet 2019 13:02 +00, Dmitry Bogatov : > Unless it is false-positive, it constitutes violation of FHS, so it > warrants "warning" severity. As stated earlier, there is a large gap on language between manual section definitions and definition for sbin/bin: hier(7) says: /sbin

Bug#570998: Re: Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-07-17 23:04] "Chris Lamb" > [adding kact...@debian.org to CC] > > Hi Vincent, > > > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864 > > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011 > > > > There is no consensus. > > Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-18 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 18 juillet 2019 10:50 +01, "Adam D. Barratt" : >> Are you sure? This is not about the alternative init but about manual >> page section. It doesn't seem Dmitry is involved at all. > > Apparently people can be interested in more than one thing. :-p > > See the MR submitter on >

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2019-07-18 05:07, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 17 juillet 2019 23:04 -03, "Chris Lamb" : - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864 - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011 There is no consensus. Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one championing this

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-17 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 17 juillet 2019 23:04 -03, "Chris Lamb" : >> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864 >> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011 >> >> There is no consensus. > > Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one championing this change, can > you please comment

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-17 Thread Chris Lamb
[adding kact...@debian.org to CC] Hi Vincent, > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864 > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011 > > There is no consensus. Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one championing this change, can you please comment on the

Bug#570998: lintian: Please check that commands in /{usr/,}sbin do not use section 1 manpages

2019-07-17 Thread Vincent Bernat
Package: lintian Followup-For: Bug #570998 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 *sigh* See: - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864 - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011 There is no consensus. hier(7) says: /sbin Like /bin, this