Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> I do not see large gap between "System management commands" and
> "binaries for system administration". So I still claim that this is FHS
> violation. But...
> ... I have to admit that fixing this warning, especially with
> non-cooperative upstream (e.g #932438) causes
[2019-07-21 14:49] Vincent Bernat
> ❦ 19 juillet 2019 13:02 +00, Dmitry Bogatov :
>
> > Unless it is false-positive, it constitutes violation of FHS, so it
> > warrants "warning" severity.
>
> As stated earlier, there is a large gap on language between manual
> section definitions and
❦ 19 juillet 2019 13:02 +00, Dmitry Bogatov :
> Unless it is false-positive, it constitutes violation of FHS, so it
> warrants "warning" severity.
As stated earlier, there is a large gap on language between manual
section definitions and definition for sbin/bin:
hier(7) says:
/sbin
[2019-07-17 23:04] "Chris Lamb"
> [adding kact...@debian.org to CC]
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864
> > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011
> >
> > There is no consensus.
>
> Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one
❦ 18 juillet 2019 10:50 +01, "Adam D. Barratt" :
>> Are you sure? This is not about the alternative init but about manual
>> page section. It doesn't seem Dmitry is involved at all.
>
> Apparently people can be interested in more than one thing. :-p
>
> See the MR submitter on
>
On 2019-07-18 05:07, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 17 juillet 2019 23:04 -03, "Chris Lamb" :
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011
There is no consensus.
Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one championing this
❦ 17 juillet 2019 23:04 -03, "Chris Lamb" :
>> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864
>> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011
>>
>> There is no consensus.
>
> Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one championing this change, can
> you please comment
[adding kact...@debian.org to CC]
Hi Vincent,
> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864
> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011
>
> There is no consensus.
Dmitry (added to CC), as you were the one championing this change, can
you please comment on the
Package: lintian
Followup-For: Bug #570998
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
*sigh*
See:
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348864
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253011
There is no consensus.
hier(7) says:
/sbin Like /bin, this
9 matches
Mail list logo