Bug#597833: ghostscript: New upstream version

2011-09-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
This bug was really about 9.0, and never closed. But 9.04 has been released some time ago. Please consider packaging it. The news file says: This release includes fixes and solutions for a number of serious problems from the earlier 9.x releases and so we _strongly_ encourage those

Bug#597833: Ghostscript/NEW

2010-11-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Moritz (cc the New Upstream Version bugreport), [I dare post this in public - hope you are fine with that] On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 12:14:12PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hi Jonas, did you see this, you'll need to poke FTP masters to get ghostscript out of NEW:

Bug#597833: Ghostscript/NEW

2010-11-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:24:30PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I didn't buy [the ftpmasters] chocolate, but posted the attached email - so far without any response from them. Whoops - forgot the attachment. Should be included now. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-10-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Daniel and others, On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi Daniel (cc Moritz), On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: do you have an ETA for an upload of 9.0 to experimental? if not, would you mind pushing your current state to a branch

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-10-08 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi Jonas, do you have an ETA for an upload of 9.0 to experimental? if not, would you mind pushing your current state to a branch in the git repository, so others can help out with the remaining stuff? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-10-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Daniel (cc Moritz), On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: do you have an ETA for an upload of 9.0 to experimental? if not, would you mind pushing your current state to a branch in the git repository, so others can help out with the remaining stuff? I hope to do

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-10-08 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 10/08/2010 05:15 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I hope to do it this weekend. nice, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-10-08 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 05:15:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi Daniel (cc Moritz), On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:25:10PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: do you have an ETA for an upload of 9.0 to experimental? if not, would you mind pushing your current state to a branch in the git

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-09-23 Thread Thomas Kempf
Package: ghostscript Version: 8.70~dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Version 9.00 with ICC support is released by upstream -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8,

Bug#597833: ghostscript: New Upstream Version

2010-09-23 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Thomas, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:28:07PM +0200, Thomas Kempf wrote: Package: ghostscript Version: 8.70~dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Version 9.00 with ICC support is released by upstream Yes. Already working on packaging it :-) Thanks for noticing, nevertheless! - Jonas -- * Jonas