On 03.02.2011 22:30, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-03 19:18 +0100, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
>> Francesco Poli a scris:
>>> tag 611913 unreproducible
>>> severity 611913 normal
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:56:25 +0200 Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>>
Subject: apt-listbugs: Breaks ins
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:22:47 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-06 22:52 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > OK, I am trying to test this fix, but I am having a hard time in
> > simulating an unpack failure!:-/
> >
> > Is there a reasonably simple way to make the unpack operation fail
>
On 2011-02-06 22:52 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:07:38 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
>> For the time being, I'll probably add the abort-install handling code
>> to the postrm script, since I want to avoid major changes (there are
>> already too many changes pending
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 21:07:38 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> For the time being, I'll probably add the abort-install handling code
> to the postrm script, since I want to avoid major changes (there are
> already too many changes pending for the next upload).
OK, I am trying to test this fix, b
retitle 611913 apt-listbugs: leaves problematic apt configuration fragment if
in config-files status and unpack fails
thanks
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:46:40 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-04 19:31 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:30:26 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
>
On 2011-02-04 19:31 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:30:26 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> or maybe your patch should be applied, since renaming
>> conffiles in maintainer scripts looks rather fragile to me.
>
> This could be a more robust solution, but I have to understand how
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:18:16 +0200 Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Francesco Poli a scris:
[...]
> > I've just tried the following in a sid chroot:
> >
> > # aptitude install apt-listbugs
> > [...]
> > # aptitude remove apt-listbugs
> > [...]
> > # ls /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs
> > ls
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:30:26 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-03 19:18 +0100, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
[...]
> > So the way to reproduce is probably install apt-listbugs and then remove it.
>
> I failed to reproduce this.
Hi Sven,
many thanks for contributing to the discussion in a constructiv
On 2011-02-03 19:18 +0100, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Francesco Poli a scris:
>> tag 611913 unreproducible
>> severity 611913 normal
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:56:25 +0200 Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: apt-listbugs: Breaks installation if removed and not purged
>>> Package: ap
Francesco Poli a scris:
> tag 611913 unreproducible
> severity 611913 normal
> thanks
>
>
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:56:25 +0200 Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
>> Subject: apt-listbugs: Breaks installation if removed and not purged
>> Package: apt-listbugs
>> Version: 0.0.90
>> Severity: critical
>> Justi
tag 611913 unreproducible
severity 611913 normal
thanks
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:56:25 +0200 Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Subject: apt-listbugs: Breaks installation if removed and not purged
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.0.90
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
[...]
>
Subject: apt-listbugs: Breaks installation if removed and not purged
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.90
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
I am aware that the 0.0.90 version is not in lenny nor in squeeze,
but I'v
12 matches
Mail list logo
