On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:04:09 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:47 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:19:07 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
m68k is not just unofficial or not officially supported. It's not
been part of Debian, nor hosted on
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:16:58 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
2012/9/19 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:46:45 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
As far as I can see, there are still the following unsolved parts of
the issue:
* unused GPL-licensed libraries
Ok, bug #688149 requests removal of gmsh on m68k.
Thanks,
Anton
2012/9/19 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
As far as I can tell, it should be enough to ask for the removal of
gmsh/2.3.0.dfsg-1 binary packages from the ports archive and
the removal should automatically propagate to
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 22:46:17 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
Ok, bug #688149 requests removal of gmsh on m68k.
Thanks a lot!
Let's wait and see...
Bye and thank you again for addressing this issue.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 19:48 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I think that this part of the issue will be relevant for the m68k
architecture, as long as gmsh is still distributed for that unofficial
architecture.
Something that is *not* legally distributable does *not* magically
become
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:19:07 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 19:48 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I think that this part of the issue will be relevant for the m68k
architecture, as long as gmsh is still distributed for that unofficial
architecture.
Something that is
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:47 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:19:07 +0100 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 19:48 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
I think that this part of the issue will be relevant for the m68k
architecture, as long as gmsh is still
Hi all!
The upstream authors of GMSH kindly agreed
to add an license exception for the OCTPL [1] (username: gmsh, password: gmsh).
===
The copyright holders of Gmsh give you permission to combine Gmsh
with code included in the standard release of TetGen (from Hang Si),
Netgen
Control: tags 617931 - pending
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:18:10 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi all!
Hello!
The upstream authors of GMSH kindly agreed
to add an license exception for the OCTPL
[...]
So I think Opencascade issue is solved.
I am afraid that this is not enough, unfortunately...
2012/9/18 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
Something that is *not* legally distributable does *not* magically
become distributable, just because the architecture is not officially
supported by the Debian Project...
This part of the issue may be irrelevant for the release of wheezy,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:19:41 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
2012/9/18 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
Something that is *not* legally distributable does *not* magically
become distributable, just because the architecture is not officially
supported by the Debian Project...
This
That is excellent news.
thanks for your work and time !
Best regards
C.
PS: Feel++ will be also unstuck too
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
The upstream authors of GMSH kindly agreed
to add an license exception for the OCTPL [1]
There seem to be other GPL-licensed libraries linked with gmsh:
libcholmod1.7.1 (some parts are GPL-licensed)
libumfpack5.4.0 (UMFPACK is GPL-licensed)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/suitesparse/current/copyright
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Linking with these
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:46:45 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
There seem to be other GPL-licensed libraries linked with gmsh:
libcholmod1.7.1 (some parts are GPL-licensed)
libumfpack5.4.0 (UMFPACK is GPL-licensed)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/suitesparse/current/copyright
2012/9/19 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:46:45 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
As far as I can see, there are still the following unsolved parts of
the issue:
* unused GPL-licensed libraries (libcholmod1.7.1 and libumfpack5.4.0)
should be kicked away from the
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:21:19 +0200 biuc...@freenet.de wrote:
Dear All,
I don't understand if this bug is solved: I see that now gmsh depends on
the OpenCASCADE Community Edition.
Dear Gabriele,
gmsh now depends on OCE (Open CASCADE Community Edition), but this
change does *not* solve the
Dear All,
I don't understand if this bug is solved: I see that now gmsh depends on the
OpenCASCADE Community Edition.
Regards,
Gabriele
---
Nutzen Sie freenet Mail optimal angepasst für Ihr iPhone, Android oder Nokia
Handy auch von unterwegs.
Alle Infos und Download unter
Package: gmsh
Version: 2.5.0.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hello again Debian Science Maintainers,
thanks for maintaining gmsh, as well.
This package is released under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 and links
with libgsl0ldbl, which is released under the terms of the GNU
GPL
All,
I've clarified the licensing terms to make it clear that we mean GPL v2
or later.
Best,
Christophe
On 12/03/11 18:03, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
Package: gmsh
Version: 2.5.0.dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Hello again Debian Science Maintainers,
thanks
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:14:53 +0100 Christophe Geuzaine wrote:
All,
I've clarified the licensing terms to make it clear that we mean GPL v2
or later.
Wow! This probably wins the Quickest Upstream Reaction Of All Times
Award™! ;-)
Thank you very much for your kind and helpful response!
I
20 matches
Mail list logo
