On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:44:31PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > If long is 64 bit, as it is on most of our 64 bit ports, I would
> > look into why it's failing instead.
> >
>
> The problem is that test BN_add. I will try to investigate why.
Do you have any update on this?
My first guess wou
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:44:31PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:13:24PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:32:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Package: openssl
> > > Version: 1.0.0d-2
> > > Severity: important
> > > Tags: patch
> > > User: d
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:13:24PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:32:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: openssl
> > Version: 1.0.0d-2
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch
> > User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: sparc64
> >
> > openssl FTBFS on s
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:32:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 1.0.0d-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: sparc64
>
> openssl FTBFS on sparc64 with a testsuite failure. This is due to a
> small configuration issue,
Package: openssl
Version: 1.0.0d-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sparc64
openssl FTBFS on sparc64 with a testsuite failure. This is due to a
small configuration issue, fixed by the patch below. I changed
SIXTY_FOUR_BIT_LONG into BN_LLONG, as it is do
5 matches
Mail list logo
