Hi,
Ximin Luo wrote (03 Aug 2011 23:12:12 GMT) :
one advantage is that cs-lite has, is a load more localisations than
cookie-monster.
I see.
so it might be worth including it in debian for the near future at
least, especially since i've already done the packaging for it.
What do you mean
On 04/08/11 10:22, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Ximin Luo wrote (03 Aug 2011 23:12:12 GMT) :
one advantage is that cs-lite has, is a load more localisations than
cookie-monster.
I see.
so it might be worth including it in debian for the near future at
least, especially since i've already done
Hi,
Ximin Luo wrote (04 Aug 2011 09:48:25 GMT) :
cs-lite has been stable for several years now with no major bugs
reported that i can see on the review page.
I'm not concerned with current bugs in cs-lite.
I'm concerned with compatibility with future Iceweasel releases,
which has not been
On 04/08/11 11:40, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
Ximin Luo wrote (04 Aug 2011 09:48:25 GMT) :
cs-lite has been stable for several years now with no major bugs
reported that i can see on the review page.
I'm not concerned with current bugs in cs-lite.
I'm concerned with compatibility with future
Hi,
Ximin Luo wrote (02 Aug 2011 21:43:26 GMT) :
* Package name: cookiesafe-lite
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : csdev https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/user/7045/
* URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cs-lite/
We've been shipping CS Lite
On 03/08/11 09:46, intrigeri wrote:
On the other hand, last time I checked, CS Lite 1.4 was unmaintained
and not compatible with FF4+. The mozilla review page [1] shows users
have been sharing patches for months to more or less fix CS Lite,
without any visible action from upstream. This makes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ximin Luo infini...@gmx.com
I intend to package this as part of the pkg-mozext group.
* Package name: cookiesafe-lite
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : csdev https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/user/7045/
* URL :
7 matches
Mail list logo