Bug#64308: state of #64308

2011-06-02 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:12:49AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Joey Hess wrote: I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to Max-Age). I'd still appreciate it if perl followed the actual RFC,

Bug#64308: state of #64308

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Hello Joey, CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says For full information on cookies see http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless: CGI::Cookie uses only the old expires field that is in the old netscape

Bug#64308: state of #64308

2009-10-16 Thread Joey Hess
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says For full information on cookies see http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless: CGI::Cookie uses only the old expires field that is in

Bug#64308: state of #64308

2009-10-16 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
package perl tags 64308 + confirmed forwarded 64308 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=50576 thanks Joey Hess wrote: I don't have comprehensive knowledge of every browser. The current version of lynx has support for the expires field (in addition to Max-Age). I'd still