Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org

2012-06-05 Thread Aron Xu
Hi, On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Harshula harsh...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:43 +1000, Harshula wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: @Harshula, Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has been removed from archive, and

Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org

2012-06-04 Thread Harshula
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:43 +1000, Harshula wrote: On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: @Harshula, Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, scim-uim and scim-hangul just now. I

Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org,

2012-05-05 Thread Aron Xu
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:15:47AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: @Harshula, Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, scim-uim and

Bug#649881: 649...@bugs.debian.org

2012-05-02 Thread Harshula
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: @Harshula, Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, scim-uim and scim-hangul just now. I think it's time to orphan scim-m17n if you plan to.