Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Under the circumstances that seems a perfectly reasonable behavior for
upstream to implement, but in Debian we hold libraries to a higher
standard. If the library *does* change its ABI, the package name in
Debian will change even if upstream fails to
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:46:14PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
Under the circumstances that seems a perfectly reasonable behavior for
upstream to implement, but in Debian we hold libraries to a higher
standard. If the library *does* change its ABI,
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org writes:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:46:14PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Note that ABI in this context has to encompass the on-disk format as
well, which I suspect Steve meant but which is worth saying explicitly,
since my guess would be that's where OpenLDAP ran
--On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 6:01 PM -0800 Russ Allbery
r...@debian.org wrote:
Do you think that's sufficient, or should I clarify this further?
No, I think that's fine. I'm just a little worried that we'll get bitten
by some future libdb change, but actually OpenLDAP may serve as an
Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com writes:
Personally, I'm hoping Debian will dump back-bdb/back-hdb entirely once
back-mdb is stable. ;)
Yeah, mdb is looking really nice, and it would be lovely to stop having to
worry about BerkeleyDB weirdness.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
5 matches
Mail list logo
