Bug#651780: fixed in sl-modem 2.9.11~20110321-5

2011-12-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 06:52 +0200, أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:10:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:34 +0200, أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed > > El-Mahmoudy) wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:31:24AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >

Bug#651780: fixed in sl-modem 2.9.11~20110321-5

2011-12-16 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:10:09PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:34 +0200, أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed > El-Mahmoudy) wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:31:24AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Sorry, no it isn't. You have to test for CONFIG_X86_32 inside of > > > Kbuild, and

Bug#651780: fixed in sl-modem 2.9.11~20110321-5

2011-12-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:34 +0200, أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:31:24AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Sorry, no it isn't. You have to test for CONFIG_X86_32 inside of > > Kbuild, and you can't use uname for this anywhere. > > Can you further explain this

Bug#651780: fixed in sl-modem 2.9.11~20110321-5

2011-12-14 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:31:24AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Sorry, no it isn't. You have to test for CONFIG_X86_32 inside of > Kbuild, and you can't use uname for this anywhere. Can you further explain this please ? > Really, the Makefile needs a thorough cleanup. Actually, I don't want to

Bug#651780: fixed in sl-modem 2.9.11~20110321-5

2011-12-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 18:32 +, أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) wrote: > Source: sl-modem > Source-Version: 2.9.11~20110321-5 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of > sl-modem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: Sorry, no it isn't. Yo