Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-29 Thread Craig Small
retitle 676381 init script needs X-Start-Before: network thankyou On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:46:12AM +0200, Dirk Griesbach wrote: I messed procps and networking, sorry for the confusion. In fact, in procps I use the line: # X-Start-Before:$network procps before $network so settings

Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-28 Thread Dirk Griesbach
Am Do, 28. Jun 2012 um 11:42:01 +1000 schrieb Craig Small: On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:47:39PM +0200, Dirk Griesbach wrote: (Which I circumvented by adding networking as Required-Start in the procps init script.) procps is run. So that would mean your change would mean procps is run after

Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-27 Thread Dirk Griesbach
Am Mon, 18. Jun 2012 um 19:12:42 +0300 schrieb Edward J. Shornock: * Craig Small csm...@debian.org [08-06-2012 03:38 EEST]: Can you check that all three items are not set? I suspect it is to do with the configuration being setup before the interface is configured. For some reason I can

Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-27 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:47:39PM +0200, Dirk Griesbach wrote: To take effect, those changes need to be setup before the interface is brought up. You will see it work if you down/up eth0 after boot. [...] (Which I circumvented by adding networking as Required-Start in the procps init script.)

Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-18 Thread Edward J. Shornock
* Craig Small csm...@debian.org [08-06-2012 03:38 EEST]: reopen 676381 thankyou On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:22:24PM +0300, Edward J. Shornock wrote: That's what I'm saying. I'm using a Debian kernel. IPv6 is compiled into the kernel. IPv6 is not a module. Yet, I still didn't have the privacy

Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-07 Thread Craig Small
reopen 676381 thankyou On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:22:24PM +0300, Edward J. Shornock wrote: That's what I'm saying. I'm using a Debian kernel. IPv6 is compiled into the kernel. IPv6 is not a module. Yet, I still didn't have the privacy addresses turned on. Anyway, I'll try to troubleshoot it

Bug#676381: procps: IPV6 privacy extensions not activted even though configured

2012-06-06 Thread Edward J. Shornock
Package: procps Version: 1:3.3.3-1 Severity: normal Even though the file /etc/sysctl.d/10-ipv6-privacy.conf exists with the following (default) contents: ---cut--- net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr=2 net.ipv6.conf.default.use_tempaddr=2 net.ipv6.conf.eth0.use_tempaddr=2 ---cut--- privacy