On Thursday 20 September 2012 05:36:56 Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
It seems that clear for me, phonon-backend-null | phonon is odd and it
should be phonon-backend-null | phonon-backend since phonon-backend-null
provides phonon-backend virtual package and pulls phonon package causes
just a
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:13:22 +0200
Sune Vuorela s...@debian.org wrote:
please cancel it.
Okay, canceled. Thanks.
The dependency on phonon *is* correct. Either you want phonon-backend-null
*or* a working phonon. Phonon is the package to depend on to get a working
phonon.
if you
On Thursday 20 September 2012 13:47:17 Hideki Yamane wrote:
Why we need to specify phonon as Depends:?
if you want a working phonon, you need to depend on phonon. that's just how it
is.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
It seems that clear for me, phonon-backend-null | phonon is odd and it
should be phonon-backend-null | phonon-backend since phonon-backend-null
provides phonon-backend virtual package and pulls phonon package causes
just a confuse.
I'll upload package include this change with
4 matches
Mail list logo
