Hi Keith,
intrigeri wrote (29 Oct 2012 21:19:47 GMT) :
Otherwise, this patch seems fine to me. Nice job!
Tagging patch accordingly: I propose we fix this bug that way, and
clone/reassign/whatever to the policy if there's still disagreement,
or need for clarification, on how to interpret the
tags 684923 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Andreas Metzler wrote (14 Oct 2012 06:49:10 GMT) :
On 2012-09-29 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
[...]
It is just not yet documented.
After reading this bug and #412159, I do concur.
/usr/share/doc/fontconfig/README.Debian seems to be
Hi,
Vincent Lefevre wrote (05 Sep 2012 08:59:59 GMT) :
No, the fact that a symlink change (whether this is done manually or
by a configuration via debconf) is not preserved after upgrade is
not regarded as a RC bug. Quoting Steve Langasek[*]:
Debian policy requires that local changes to
On 2012-09-29 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
[...]
It is just not yet documented.
/usr/share/doc/fontconfig/README.Debian seems to be outdated.
* /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-debconf-no-bitmaps.conf was the filename used in
old versions of fontconfig ( 2.4.x?)
* The package one
On 2012-09-06 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
Let's assume you were talking about fontconfig's README.Debian instead;
it has:
| If you wish to enable bitmapped fonts manually, either reconfigure this
| package (with dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config), or remove the
| symbolic
Am 05.09.2012 10:32, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Says which doc? None AFAICT. Does conf.d/README talk about debconf at
all? Hell no.
No, but it says
If you wish to enable bitmapped fonts manually, either reconfigure
this package (with dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig-config), or remove
the
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (06/09/2012):
Am 05.09.2012 10:32, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Says which doc? None AFAICT. Does conf.d/README talk about debconf at
all? Hell no.
No, but it says
If you wish to enable bitmapped fonts manually, either reconfigure
this package (with
Am 06.09.2012 12:37, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
(A) The filename is wrong.
Yes, I am sorry I mixed up the file names.
(B) Removing the symlink is documented and not honored.
It's another symlink than the one you changed. Compare
70-yes-bitmaps.conf vs. 30-debconf-no-bitmaps.conf.
But in
kibi@kathleen:/etc/fonts/conf.d$ ls -l 70-no-bitmaps.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 Aug 14 21:11 70-no-bitmaps.conf -
../conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf
Well, there's your problem.
Obviously, you manually changed the symlink 70-no-bitmaps.conf to
point to another file
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (05/09/2012):
Obviously, you manually changed the symlink 70-no-bitmaps.conf to
point to another file ../conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf. However,
the symlinks are expected to point to files of the same name in the
../conf.avail directory.
Says which doc?
On 2012-09-05 10:32:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (05/09/2012):
Obviously, you manually changed the symlink 70-no-bitmaps.conf to
point to another file ../conf.avail/70-yes-bitmaps.conf. However,
the symlinks are expected to point to files of the
On 2012-08-14 21:20:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
/etc/fonts/conf.d/README pretends:
,---
| Each file in this directory is a fontconfig configuration file. Fontconfig
| scans this directory, loading all files of the form [0-9][0-9]*.conf.
| These files are normally installed in
Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net (04/09/2012):
kibi@kathleen:/etc/fonts/conf.d$ ls -l 70-no-bitmaps.conf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 Aug 14 21:11 70-no-bitmaps.conf -
/etc/fonts/conf.avail/70-no-bitmaps.conf
Glancing at the postinst, that might be due to your retrieving values
from
On 2012-09-04 20:15:49 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Since you don't seem to understand “debconf is not a registry”, please
go read Debian Policy 10.7.3. What's stored in debconf doesn't matter.
Debian Policy 10.7.3 has nothing about debconf and nothing about
your bug.
--
Vincent Lefèvre
Package: fontconfig-config
Version: 2.9.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: debconf is not a registry
Hi,
given I like the Fixed font, I got rid of the following file a while
ago: /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
Restarting my X session today, no more Fixed! And indeed, that file is
back.
15 matches
Mail list logo
