severity 687931 important
thanks
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> Looking at the error, it's not a segfault, whouldn't lead to a security
>> issue. It's "just" unsupported functionality, even if it doesn
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Looking at the error, it's not a segfault, whouldn't lead to a security
> issue. It's "just" unsupported functionality, even if it doesn't error
> out gracefully.
>
> So does it really justify RC status? Don't get me wrong: I don't w
On 10/01/2012 10:51 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> On 10/01/2012 01:03 AM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>>> rofl.tif is all black, 888x458 pixels. (Roland, is that what you were
>>> expecting?)
>>
>> I'm not sure what image contents Mathieu intende
Hi all,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 01:03 AM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>> rofl.tif is all black, 888x458 pixels. (Roland, is that what you were
>> expecting?)
>
> I'm not sure what image contents Mathieu intended, but will need to
> check the backtrace. We s
Hi Asheesh,
thank you for the further information!
On 10/01/2012 01:03 AM, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> rofl.tif is all black, 888x458 pixels. (Roland, is that what you were
> expecting?)
I'm not sure what image contents Mathieu intended, but will need to
check the backtrace. We somehow need to suppo
I can reproduce the crash.
Note that "openjpeg-tools" does not crash on this file. Demonstration:
Run these:
sudo apt-get install openjpeg-tools
wget
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi\?msg\=5\;filename\=jas_image_readcmpt2_SIGABRT.j2k\;att\=1\;bug\=687931
-O bugreport.j2k
Then w
6 matches
Mail list logo
