Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-31 Thread Tim Booth
Hi Andreas, It works for me! Could you share your failed build log, please? I built PyQi from your latest SVN and then built the latest biom-format against it. What's more, I had the build log from building against PyQi 0.2.0 and I diffed it with the new build log. They were essentially

Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tim, On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:14:58PM +0100, Tim Booth wrote: It works for me! Could you share your failed build log, please? The cruxial part is $ pyqi make-bash-completion --command-config-module biom.interfaces.optparse.config --driver-name biom -o debian/bash-completion Traceback

Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tim, On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 06:48:03PM +0100, Tim Booth wrote: ... Normally, 'export PYTHONPATH=.' is redundant but here it seems to be effective. I can confirm this. So I'll spend some cycles tomorrow to fix the remaining lintian issues. Thanks for your hint. No, just stick with what

Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tim, On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 03:46:01PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: My guess is that updating PyQi might help (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyqi/). Did you already do that? No, I did not. I just realised that this also has moved. To bad if projects are moving and our watch files are

Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:54:11AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: ok -- done -- see patch attached I just realised that Biom-format has moved to a different location and thus we missed the new version. When inspecting this I realised that it is not using Cython any more - so the problem

Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Tim, On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:37:44PM +, Tim Booth wrote: Hi Andreas, I have updated the packaging at svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/ and have the following questions (specifically also to Tim): 1. Did you forwarded

Bug#742691: New version of python-biom-format (Was: Bug#742691: please make robust against ad-hoc (pre/post released) versions of cython)

2014-03-27 Thread Tim Booth
Hi Andreas, I have updated the packaging at svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/packages/python-biom-format/trunk/ and have the following questions (specifically also to Tim): 1. Did you forwarded this patch to upstream?