Is it that so? Are all Atmel adjustments included in the 1.8.1?
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Simon John g...@the-jedi.co.uk wrote:
Hi folks,
is there any update on this? Would it be possible to pull in the header?
Why are we using the Atmel patches? Its going to be a long time before
we
i'm not sure what the atmel adjustments are. from what i can see they
just package up the upstream avr-libc.
if you look at the source from atmel, there doesn't appear to be any
patches, it just looks like upstream avr-libc:
Hi,
atmel-adjusted headers are provided in the file avr8-headers-6.2.0.334.zip
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Simon John g...@the-jedi.co.uk wrote:
i'm not sure what the atmel adjustments are. from what i can see they
just package up the upstream avr-libc.
if you look at the source from
ah, don't know why i didn't see them!
not sure how we'd compare the atmel headers with upstream, a diff is
going to be pointless and filesizes are totally different - e.g. 56k
atmel vs. 201k avr-libc trunk for iom256rfr2.h
i wonder if there's a changelog that says what atmel's changes were and
Hi folks,
is there any update on this? Would it be possible to pull in the header?
Why are we using the Atmel patches? Its going to be a long time before
we get avr-libc 1.8.1 that way.
For a couple of years avr-libc upstream looked a bit dead so Atmel was
the only choice, but now I'd say
Hi Simon,
thanx for the report. I suppose we could pull in a single header file
from avr-libc trunk if the general consensus is that the Atmel version
is in a bad state.
Aurelien, you been pushing for using the Atmel patches. Can you see
any issues with this? Thanx.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 11:01
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.8.0+Atmel3.4.4-1
When compiling firmware for Pinoccio (https://pinocc.io/) which uses and
ATmega256RFR2, I get various errors from HardwareSerial.cpp which
prevents the firmware from compiling. For log see:
https://gist.github.com/sej7278/51c8853e06ba667d2135
If I
7 matches
Mail list logo
