On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 09:09:29 -0500, Lukasz Jagielski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
But in any case I don't think that using a different admindir is
something really supported in normal packaging.
My use case is i686 package compiled using
Hi,
My use case is i686 package compiled using sysroot on amd64 system, I
want to use the same sysroot for deb generation.
Here's a patch that works for me http://pastebin.com/6mfeVgKc
Regards,
Lukasz
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
On Tue,
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.17.23
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I've run into this problem when trying to generate dpkg packages using
non-standard dpkg admin dir. I've noticed that dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't
fully honour --admindir parameter, since its internal call to dpkg --search
isn't
Hi!
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 05:20:07 -0500, Lukasz Jagielski wrote:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.17.23
Severity: normal
I've run into this problem when trying to generate dpkg packages using
non-standard dpkg admin dir. I've noticed that dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't
fully honour --admindir
4 matches
Mail list logo
