Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-03 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Freitag, den 02.10.2015, 07:27 -0600 schrieb Dave Crossland: > The official name is the rfn name; that's why the maintainer reserved > the name. The distros need to rename or get permission. Same as > Firefox. So, I am currently rebuilding the Cantarell fonts from the provided .sfd sources for

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Dave Crossland
A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a kind of format change On Oct 2, 2015 6:02 AM, "Norbert Preining" wrote: > > What is the relationship between the googlefonts repos and

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015, Dave Crossland wrote: > A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification > triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a > kind of format change Then what about shipping the ttf/otf as distributed? Why do we Debian people

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Dave Crossland
On Oct 2, 2015 7:32 AM, "Norbert Preining" wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Oct 2015, Dave Crossland wrote: > > A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification > > triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary is a > > kind of format change > >

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 07:07 -0600, Dave Crossland wrote: > A format conversion is listed explicitly in the ofl as modification > triggering rfn permission / renaming, and converting source to binary > is a kind of format change In addition, various historical things have meant that rebuilding

Bug#776273: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#776273: [googlefonts-discuss] sfd files for Play font

2015-10-02 Thread Norbert Preining
> What is the relationship between the googlefonts repos and the google > fonts repo? It seems a bit weird to have two places for the same stuff. Looking at the repos, the google fonts repo contains the built, ie ready made files, while the googlefonts repo the sources. Not that this is an