Additionally:
1) user creates a bunch of subvolumes (and/or snapshots)
2) user would like to count how many subvols he/she has created and
runs btrfs sub list $PATH
3) -> ERROR: can't perform the search: Operation not permitted
If a regular user cannot locate, count, or remove subvolumes then
Hi,
I'd also like to add the following argument for why upstream intends
btrfs-progs to be installed to /sbin and not /bin:
man btrfs -> btrfs(8)
man mkfs.btrfs -> mkfs.btrfs(8)
man man-pages defines section 8 as:
8 System management commands
Commands like mount(8), many of which
control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Hi,
These days, I'm trying to triage btrfs-progs issues (note: I'm not the
maintainer).
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>>Please do not get hung up on *one* example. There are so many issues, but
>>I'm not going to spend my time on trying to give you a
Dear maintainer,
please address this issue. I fully agree with Message #5 about fixing. Many
more packages affected and rendered useless.
Best regards,
Volker
Package: btrfs-tools
Version: 4.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #786893
This is still a problem. Please fix it properly or revert the commit that did
this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Hello Dimitri John Ledkov.
Thanks for your quick reply.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:53:09PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
On 26 May 2015 at 14:51, Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se wrote:
[...]
Just one example is that mkfs -t btrfs ... apparently no longer works.
[...]
Looks like a bug
Source: btrfs-tools
Version: 4.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This is a followup bug report asking you to revert the changes
you did to handle #770806 (where you IMHO should just have answered no).
By moving binaries around (without even keeping compat symlinks) you
cause all kinds of
On 26 May 2015 at 14:51, Andreas Henriksson andr...@fatal.se wrote:
Source: btrfs-tools
Version: 4.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This is a followup bug report asking you to revert the changes
you did to handle #770806 (where you IMHO should just have answered no).
By moving
8 matches
Mail list logo