tag 787659 + pending
thanks
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:24:02PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> 5.0 gets many gtk3 work, so maybe in 5.0 it will be out of experimental, if
> that is the case I'll do that, yes.
There we go:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-5-0&id=0
tags 787659 - wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:30:28PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I see.
>
> But wouldn't it make sense to keep it open till then?
It _is_ open. wontfix doesn't mean the bug is closed :)
> wontfix doesn't seem to be the appropriate status, when you an
I see.
But wouldn't it make sense to keep it open till then?
wontfix doesn't seem to be the appropriate status, when you anyway want
to do this, and when this is the way things go on the long term scale.
Cheers,
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
severity 787659 normal
tag 787659 + wontfix
forcemerge 681180 787659
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:53:42PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> libreoffice-gnome depends on libreoffice-gtk, which is GTK2.
> libreoffice-gtk3 seems to be the GTK3 alternative to the former.
I know.
> W
Package: libreoffice-gnome
Version: 1:4.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
libreoffice-gnome depends on libreoffice-gtk, which is GTK2.
libreoffice-gtk3 seems to be the GTK3 alternative to the former.
Wouldn't it make sense to depend on this alternatively (probably
with the GTK3 version being the def
5 matches
Mail list logo
