On 10/07/17 11:45, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:04PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> > Wow, this is nice. Would you mind adding some tests to cover this?
> > Ideally, we would have coverage for all rsyncable "dialects" we
> > support. Can you commit to collab-maint?
>
>
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:04PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Wow, this is nice. Would you mind adding some tests to cover this?
> Ideally, we would have coverage for all rsyncable "dialects" we
> support. Can you commit to collab-maint?
Something like this perhaps:
diff --git
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:04PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> Wow, this is nice. Would you mind adding some tests to cover this?
> Ideally, we would have coverage for all rsyncable "dialects" we
> support.
I can try to add some test coverage. I will have to check how to do that.
>Can you
On 07/07/17 10:34, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I managed to fix almost half the failures in knownproblems by making
> --gnu always be tried rather than only when GZIP_OS_UNIX is found.
> Doing the same for --rsyncable and --new-rsyncable probably makes sense
> too.
>
> The --new-rsyncable was
I managed to fix almost half the failures in knownproblems by making
--gnu always be tried rather than only when GZIP_OS_UNIX is found.
Doing the same for --rsyncable and --new-rsyncable probably makes sense
too.
The --new-rsyncable was written for gzip 1.4, while gzip 1.6 does things
a bit
5 matches
Mail list logo