Bug#805488: [Patch] Fix (including for a lot of other failing tarballs)

2017-07-12 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 10/07/17 11:45, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:04PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > Wow, this is nice. Would you mind adding some tests to cover this? > > Ideally, we would have coverage for all rsyncable "dialects" we > > support. Can you commit to collab-maint? > >

Bug#805488: [Patch] Fix (including for a lot of other failing tarballs)

2017-07-10 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:04PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > Wow, this is nice. Would you mind adding some tests to cover this? > Ideally, we would have coverage for all rsyncable "dialects" we > support. Can you commit to collab-maint? Something like this perhaps: diff --git

Bug#805488: [Patch] Fix (including for a lot of other failing tarballs)

2017-07-07 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:10:04PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > Wow, this is nice. Would you mind adding some tests to cover this? > Ideally, we would have coverage for all rsyncable "dialects" we > support. I can try to add some test coverage. I will have to check how to do that. >Can you

Bug#805488: [Patch] Fix (including for a lot of other failing tarballs)

2017-07-07 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 07/07/17 10:34, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > I managed to fix almost half the failures in knownproblems by making > --gnu always be tried rather than only when GZIP_OS_UNIX is found. > Doing the same for --rsyncable and --new-rsyncable probably makes sense > too. > > The --new-rsyncable was

Bug#805488: [Patch] Fix (including for a lot of other failing tarballs)

2017-07-07 Thread Lennart Sorensen
I managed to fix almost half the failures in knownproblems by making --gnu always be tried rather than only when GZIP_OS_UNIX is found. Doing the same for --rsyncable and --new-rsyncable probably makes sense too. The --new-rsyncable was written for gzip 1.4, while gzip 1.6 does things a bit