Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-18 Thread Pierre Neyron
Hello, Done here: https://github.com/dell/dkms/issues/74 BR, Pierre On 16/01/2019 11:31, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: hello, diverging from upstream makes no sense to me, since the mkdeb approach has been introduced by us... what about discussing this with them and find a common approach?

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
hello, diverging from upstream makes no sense to me, since the mkdeb approach has been introduced by us...what about discussing this with them and find a common approach? I'm not a direct user of this tool, so I can't have an opinion :) G. Il lunedì 14 gennaio 2019, 13:21:58 CET, Pierre

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-14 Thread Pierre Neyron
Hello Gianfranco, Ok, but what mkdeb patch would you like ? a- should it actually include binaries unless source-only is set ? or b- should it generate an arch independent _all.deb package (with man page fixed accordingly) ? I'm more likely to volunteer for b, even if it makes Debian's

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello,I'm happy to accept an eventual patch :) G. Il domenica 13 gennaio 2019, 17:10:39 CET, Pierre Neyron ha scritto: On 13/01/2019 16:18, drake763 wrote: > Thanks again for your quick and detailed response! > > On 1/13/19 2:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Now, dkms run on

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread Pierre Neyron
On 13/01/2019 16:18, drake763 wrote: Thanks again for your quick and detailed response! On 1/13/19 2:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Now, dkms run on amd64 produces binaries for *amd64* architecture, and if you run the same command on i386 you will produce kernel modules that can run only

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread drake763
Thanks again for your quick and detailed response! On 1/13/19 2:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Now, dkms run on amd64 produces binaries for *amd64* architecture, and if you > run the same command > on i386 you will produce kernel modules that can run only on *i386* > architecture In my

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread Dirk Griesbach
OP here, Am So, 13. Jan 2019 um 14:49:06 +0100 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:29:13 +0100 drake763 wrote: 2) The fix in 2.6.1-3 produces (when creating a deb package) a package named PACKAGENAME_amd64.deb, where amd64 is my compiling computer's architecture. However, it

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 13:29:13 +0100 drake763 wrote: > Dear maintainers, > > Thank you very much for your work and reply! I have three issues/questions: > > 1) The bug is *NOT* fixed in 2.6.1-1 (which is in stretch-backports) but > first in 2.6.1-3 (testing/sid). > this is normal, I'll backport

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-13 Thread drake763
Dear maintainers, Thank you very much for your work and reply! I have three issues/questions: 1) The bug is *NOT* fixed in 2.6.1-1 (which is in stretch-backports) but first in 2.6.1-3 (testing/sid). 2) The fix in 2.6.1-3 produces (when creating a deb package) a package named

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2019-01-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:17:32 +0100 drake763 wrote: > Hi, > > I'd also second the request to patch this bug. This bug is not present > in upstream but only in debian and thus ubuntu. It was introduced in > debian specific patch [1]. > > The part of Pierre's patch mentioned in this thread

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-12-03 Thread drake763
Hi, I'd also second the request to patch this bug. This bug is not present in upstream but only in debian and thus ubuntu. It was introduced in debian specific patch [1]. The part of Pierre's patch mentioned in this thread would fix this and it would be highly appreciated if at least the

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-11-16 Thread hikaru . debian
Hello, I understand the exchange between upstream and Debian is a bit sluggish here, but besides that, is there a reason why Pierre's patch has never been applied? The current situation breaks mkdeb (in some cases?) (e.g. phc_intel [1]) and this part of Pierre's patch would fix this: > - fix

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-02-12 Thread Mario.Limonciello
;mario_limoncie...@dell.com>; 832...@bugs.debian.org; > pkg-dkms-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Subject: Re: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb > > Hi Marco, > > Problem is Debian dkms (v2.3) seems to be an old fork of github/dell > dkms (v2.5).

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-02-12 Thread Pierre Neyron
ebruary 12, 2018 11:21 AM >> To: 832...@bugs.debian.org >> Subject: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb >> >> Please find attached a patch for the dkms script (package version 2.3-3) >> that fixes the following issues: >> >> - fix mkde

Bug#832558: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-02-12 Thread Mario.Limonciello
> -Original Message- > From: Pkg-dkms-maint [mailto:pkg-dkms-maint- > bounces+mario_limonciello=dell@lists.alioth.debian.org] On Behalf Of > Pierre > Neyron > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 11:21 AM > To: 832...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: [Pkg-dkms-maint] Bu

Bug#832558: Fix dkms mkdeb / mkdsc / mkbmdeb

2018-02-12 Thread Pierre Neyron
Please find attached a patch for the dkms script (package version 2.3-3) that fixes the following issues: - fix mkdeb (1): mkdeb failed because a mv command was looking for a package filename with -${debian_build_arch} instead of -all. - fix mkdeb (2): allow creating a dkms package without