Hi Guilhem,
Quoting Guilhem Moulin (2016-09-10 01:53:56)
> Fair enough, I shouldn't have rushed this due to the train arriving at
> destination, sorry :-P The actual bug I was trying to fix was #834898, but
> you released 0.71.0-1 meanwhile. Since your fix is a lot more complicated
> than
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 at 00:19:02 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> I do not see any bug here. You are just describing the current situation.
> Please describe the problem you are experiencing.
Fair enough, I shouldn't have rushed this due to the train arriving at
Hi,
Quoting Guilhem Moulin (2016-09-10 00:04:19)
> #833547/#834898 have been fixed by adding a call to ‘gpgconf --kill
> gpg-agent’. I was wondering whether access to private key material from
> inside the chroot is required at all? Sbuild::ResolverBase reads
>
> # Sign the release file
>
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.71.0-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
#833547/#834898 have been fixed by adding a call to ‘gpgconf --kill
gpg-agent’. I was wondering whether access to private key material from
inside the chroot is required at all? Sbuild::ResolverBase reads
# Sign the
4 matches
Mail list logo
