Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

So, does someone want to propose a resolution so we can move this forward?

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

> "Ian" == Ian Jackson writes: Ian> I know that you do not _set out_ reinforce Ron's position of Ian> power over his victims. That is not your goal. You are trying Ian> to come to an amicable settlement. You are trying to get Ian> everyone

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

Sam Hartman writes ("Re: Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts"): > I am not prepared to override those seeking global6 either. I don't know quite how to put this. I'm afraid that what I say is going to sound quite aggressive and hurtful. But I think it is a very important poi

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

>>>>> "Ian" == Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: Ian> Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts"): >> Like you I want to see global6 for stretch. I'm not sure I want >> to see it bad enough

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts"): > Like you I want to see global6 for stretch. > I'm not sure I want to see it bad enough to override someone. > I'd rank doing so above FD though but below a pure advice option. Why are you prepared to override[0]

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

Like you I want to see global6 for stretch. I'm not sure I want to see it bad enough to override someone. I'd rank doing so above FD though but below a pure advice option.

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

Le mercredi, 30 novembre 2016, 14.11:43 h CET Sam Hartman a écrit : > I'd really like to see the TC offer at least the following advice: > > 1) We believe that strong evidence is required to hold back integrating > new versions of software like global. The burden of proof is on those > who

Bug#841294: Global Ballot Thoughts

I'd really like to see the TC offer at least the following advice: 1) We believe that strong evidence is required to hold back integrating new versions of software like global. The burden of proof is on those who propose not to update, not on those who would like Debian to contain current