On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:33:33PM +0100, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> After having some reservations about this, I decided to introduce it
> in the next release of pristine-tar (to be released after the release
> of stretch). However, this is "unofficial" in a sense that, yes, it's
> going to sort
On 23/10/16 19:24, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 09:09:53PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> > What about piping "pristine-tar list" to "sort -V"?
>
> Sure, that works, but IMHO this should be done by pristine-tar itself.
> Actually I've never been so bothered to pipe it through
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 09:09:53PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> What about piping "pristine-tar list" to "sort -V"?
Sure, that works, but IMHO this should be done by pristine-tar itself.
Actually I've never been so bothered to pipe it through `sort -V`, and I
filed this bug just to ease a itch,
On 21/10/16 11:06, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> package: pristine-tar
> version: 1.37
> severity: wishlist
>
> % pristine-tar list
> setuptools-scm_1.10.1.orig.tar.bz2
> setuptools-scm_1.15.0.orig.tar.gz
> setuptools-scm_1.7.0.orig.tar.gz
> setuptools-scm_1.8.0.orig.tar.bz2
>
> I'd prefer if it would
package: pristine-tar
version: 1.37
severity: wishlist
% pristine-tar list
setuptools-scm_1.10.1.orig.tar.bz2
setuptools-scm_1.15.0.orig.tar.gz
setuptools-scm_1.7.0.orig.tar.gz
setuptools-scm_1.8.0.orig.tar.bz2
%
I'd prefer if it would use natural ordering¹ while sorting, so that
version 1.7
5 matches
Mail list logo
