Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme

2020-09-26 Thread itd
Hi, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > Last I tried the packaging branch above it did actually work (with the > test suite results ignored), but that was a while ago. "me too". e65c5f7b did build successfully and works as far as I can tell; this is my first taste of guix. (I also use the script

Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme

2020-09-21 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2020-09-21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 17/04/20 at 17:25 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> All the build-depends are packaged and may as well call this an ITP now. >> Would still very much welcome help maintaining this, though! >> >> Packaging branch updated to 1.1.0: >> >>

Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme

2020-09-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Vagrant, On 17/04/20 at 17:25 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > All the build-depends are packaged and may as well call this an ITP now. > Would still very much welcome help maintaining this, though! > > Packaging branch updated to 1.1.0: > > https://salsa.debian.org/vagrant/guix Any

Bug#850644: ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme

2020-04-17 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: retitle 850644 ITP: guix -- A functional package manager based on Scheme All the build-depends are packaged and may as well call this an ITP now. Would still very much welcome help maintaining this, though! Packaging branch updated to 1.1.0: https://salsa.debian.org/vagrant/guix