Bug#856463: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#856463: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow

2017-03-13 Thread Stephan Gampert | GIP
Hello Mathieu, I can't say for sur. But this looks strange. But why is packet 34 more than 7 seconds after packet 28? I don't know. Perhaps the server is waiting for a response to the Locking AndX Request. Can you post here the debugdata and the kernel log as per:

Bug#856463: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#856463: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow

2017-03-09 Thread Stephan Gampert | GIP
Hello Mathieu, We have tested it with Debian stretch (installed from iso-image downloaded today, 2017-01-28). The problem still exists in stretch. Accessing a file with length 1067 still lasts some seconds. Regards Stephan -- Stephan Gampert _ GIP Exyr GmbH Hechtsheimer

Bug#856463: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#856463: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow

2017-03-09 Thread Stephan Gampert | GIP
Hello Mathieu, thank you very much for your answer. Unfortunately we need the symlinks, so removing the mfsymlinks option is not really an option for us. We've already tried to use jessy. We had the same problem there. We will test it with Debian stretch. > It is because the complete file

Bug#856463: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#856463: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow

2017-03-08 Thread Mathieu Parent
"Control: severity -1 wishlist Control: tag -1 upstream 2017-03-01 10:54 GMT+01:00 Stephan Gampert | GIP : > Subject: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow [...] > we are using cifs-utils to access Microsoft Windows 2012R2 File-Server >

Bug#856463: [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#856463: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow

2017-03-02 Thread Mathieu Parent
2017-03-01 10:54 GMT+01:00 Stephan Gampert | GIP : > Subject: cifs-utils: Accessing files with length of 1067 bytes extremly slow [...] > > All of the "slow files" have a length of 1067 bytes. > As far as I know this is also the length of symlink files. Perhaps there is >