Hi,
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 08:42:16PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > And obviously, since "qtwebkit" and "webkit" are both mentioned
> > > already, the mentioning of "webkit" does not imply any webkit fork as
> > > otherwise "qtwebkit" wouldn't be in
Hi Julien,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> > And obviously, since "qtwebkit" and "webkit" are both mentioned
> > already, the mentioning of "webkit" does not imply any webkit fork as
> > otherwise "qtwebkit" wouldn't be in there.
>
> OK. I didn't think that list is intended as a list of source
>
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 20:29:46 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > > Therefore, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit and khtml engines
> > > > are included in stretch, but not covered by security support. These
> > > > browsers should not be used against
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > Therefore, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit and khtml engines
> > > are included in stretch, but not covered by security support. These
> > > browsers should not be used against untrusted websites.
> >
> > But according to
> >
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 20:13:56 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#browser-security
> says:
>
> > Therefore, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit and khtml engines
> > are included in stretch, but not covered by
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Hi,
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#browser-security
says:
> Therefore, browsers built upon the webkit, qtwebkit and khtml engines
> are included in stretch, but not covered by security
6 matches
Mail list logo
