Bug#880997: nageru: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:48:03PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> FWIW, last time I asked about this, it was a toolchain bug on armel > >> (std::atomic doesn't work). Is there any other information I should know > >> about? >

Bug#880997: nageru: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-07 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:21:24PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> FWIW, last time I asked about this, it was a toolchain bug on armel >> (std::atomic doesn't work). Is there any other information I should know >> about? > It is not true that std::atomic doesn't work on armel, > and that's not what

Bug#880997: nageru: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags -1 patch On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:59:37PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:51:27PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > | /usr/bin/ld: httpd.o: undefined reference to symbol > > '__atomic_fetch_sub_8@@LIBATOMIC_1.0' > > |

Bug#880997: nageru: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-06 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 08:51:27PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > | /usr/bin/ld: httpd.o: undefined reference to symbol > '__atomic_fetch_sub_8@@LIBATOMIC_1.0' > | //usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libatomic.so.1: error adding symbols: DSO > missing from command line FWIW, last time I asked about

Bug#880997: nageru: FTBFS on armel

2017-11-06 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Source: nageru Version: 1.6.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Tags: sid buster Control: block 880355 by -1 nageru FTBFS on armel when binNMUed for the libva transition: | g++ -o nageru glwidget.o mainwindow.o vumeter.o lrameter.o