Hi again,
Markus Koschany wrote:
> Let me try to explain it this way: Take src:ufoai-data or src:netbeans
> for example. Both packages ship approximately a dozen different
> licenses. I can't simply copy the upstream license because I have
> to format it to make it copyright format 1.0
Am 13.12.2017 um 19:56 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi,
>
> Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> I would like to argue that disk space is no longer an issue in 2017 and
>> people with special needs (embedded systems) will most likely remove
>> /usr/share/common-licenses anyway.
>
> I agree: space on
Hi,
Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to argue that disk space is no longer an issue in 2017 and
> people with special needs (embedded systems) will most likely remove
> /usr/share/common-licenses anyway.
I agree: space on installation media and network transfer time are more
important than
Am 13.12.2017 um 19:18 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
>> licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
>> maintainers are allowed to reference them.
>>
>> License: EPL-1.0
>>
Markus Koschany wrote:
> as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
> licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
> maintainers are allowed to reference them.
>
> License: EPL-1.0
> Source: https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
> Example
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.1.2.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
maintainers are allowed to reference them.
License: EPL-1.0
Source:
6 matches
Mail list logo
