On 03/18/2018 09:24 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tyler Hicks:
>>> 3. Give me the go ahead and then I'll:
>>>
>>>- refresh the {debian,ubuntu}/gbp-pq branches
>>>- merge the {debian,ubuntu}/gbp-pq branches respectively into
>>> {debian,ubuntu}/master
>>>- push {debian,ubuntu}/mas
Hi,
Tyler Hicks:
> On 02/28/2018 04:56 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> 1. Start using the ubuntu/* namespace on the Git repo on salsa for the
>>Ubuntu packaging. I've already imported your work up to
>>2.11.0-2ubuntu19 there.
> Done! […]
>> 2. Merge the latest debian/2.12-* tag into ubuntu/maste
On 03/14/2018 10:46 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 02/28/2018 04:56 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> It would be great if we could do that before 18.04 LTS is too deeply
>> frozen so you can benefit, in the next 5 years, from all the goodness
>> ubuntu/master..debian/master has accumulated since your last merg
On 02/28/2018 04:56 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve Beattie:
>> Sorry, I've been swamped coping with Meltdown/Spectre. I took a brief
>> look at the topic git branches and it seems like a modest enough
>> organizational improvement to me[1].
>
> OK. To me being able to use gbp-pq is a life-c
Hi,
Steve Beattie:
> Sorry, I've been swamped coping with Meltdown/Spectre. I took a brief
> look at the topic git branches and it seems like a modest enough
> organizational improvement to me[1].
OK. To me being able to use gbp-pq is a life-changer and I hope it'll
be the same for you once you g
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 03:13:21PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi maintainers of src:apparmor in Ubuntu,
>
> [keeping Simon in Cc because I suspect he's interested in this topic
> for Apertis — whose fork of Ubuntu's src:apparmor is already
> maintained in Git.]
>
> intrigeri wrote (2018-01-29):
>
Hi maintainers of src:apparmor in Ubuntu,
[keeping Simon in Cc because I suspect he's interested in this topic
for Apertis — whose fork of Ubuntu's src:apparmor is already
maintained in Git.]
intrigeri wrote (2018-01-29):
> [explicitly Cc'ing the Ubuntu maintainers; if you missed the beginning
>
Hi,
[explicitly Cc'ing the Ubuntu maintainers; if you missed the beginning
of this thread, for context see https://bugs.debian.org/888244]
I've prepared 2 PoC branches, both hosted in the Git repository on
Salsa where the Debian packaging now lives, and that would happily
welcome the Ubuntu packa
Hi,
Simon McVittie:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 at 09:23:16 +0100, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> I also use a version of this for dbus and the bubblewrap/ostree/flatpak
> group of packages. The difference in those packages is that I use
> "topic 1.2.3" for patches that have been successfully upstreamed
9 matches
Mail list logo
